USC Mentoring Awards


PURPOSE

The USC Mentoring Awards honor individual faculty members for helping to build a supportive academic environment through faculty-to-student mentoring and faculty-to-faculty mentoring. Distinguished mentoring for academic and professional success occurs at USC through formal and informal channels, and may vary in style and substance from discipline to discipline.

AWARD CATEGORIES

  • Faculty Mentoring Faculty, Postdoctoral Scholars, Medical Residents, and Fellows
  • Faculty Mentoring Graduate Students
  • Faculty Mentoring Undergraduate Students

CRITERIA FOR AWARDS

The criteria for distinguished mentoring at USC have been enhanced as a result of recommendations made by the 2015-2016 Joint Senate/Provost Mentoring Committee, under the leadership of Dorian Traube. Individual awards will be given to faculty members who consistently excel at most or all of the following criteria.

  1. Goal Setting: Exploring mentees’ talents and interests to assist them in defining and attaining their goals.
  2. Support: Encouraging growth and achievement by providing an open and supportive environment.
  3. Information and Advice: Carving out regular time to share their knowledge, experiences, and wisdom to guide mentees in reaching their academic, professional, and/or personal goals.
  4. Feedback: Making themselves available to provide regular and constructive feedback on their mentees’ work, when mentees request it.
  5. Professional Exposure: Involving mentees in publications, grants, presentations, expositions, or professional/leadership opportunities, and readily sharing knowledge of other such opportunities with mentees.
  6. Networking: Providing valuable access and opportunities by facilitating academic, professional, and personal contacts.
  7. Inclusion: Creating access by sharing knowledge of the political landscape and power dynamics in the discipline, and effective strategies for navigating those structures. Working with mentees from underrepresented, first-generation, or marginalized groups within the discipline is a priority, with attention paid to developing skills and support networks for overcoming institutional barriers they may face in the field.
  8. Role Model: Maintaining high standards for excellence within their own discipline and as an engaged member of the University community. Engaging in respectful relationships with colleagues, junior colleagues, and students. Acknowledging power differentials in professional relationships and behaving with integrity, in line with USC’s Code of Ethics. Encouraging mentees to adopt similar principles of professional behavior.

ELIGIBILITY FOR NOMINATIONS

All faculty members—part-time and full-time—currently employed by USC are eligible for nomination. A nominee may not win two years in a row.

NOMINATION PROCEDURES

Submit a complete nomination form and maximum of TWO letters supporting the nomination in addition to the letter from the primary nominator. Letters can be solicited from past or present mentees of the nominee, the nominee’s department chair, the nominee’s dean, or other appropriate individuals. Letters should not exceed two pages each.

Letters of support can be submitted at the same time as the nomination form or separately here.

For those faculty with multiple nomination, the committee will review the first nomination submitted.

All nomination forms and letters of support must be submitted electronically by 5:00pm on Friday, January 26, 2018.

Paper nominations will not be accepted and nominations cannot be supplemented after the deadline.

TIMETABLE

Nominations submitted by 5:00 p.m., January 26, 2018.

Selection announced by April 27, 2018.

Awards Ceremony: May 2, 2018.

For questions, please contact the USC Center for Excellence in Teaching at usccet@usc.edu.

Last updated July 2, 2018